|
|
|
±èÀ±Èñ ( Kim Yun-Hee ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇпø
°¼¿µ ( Kang Seo-Young ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇпø ±è¹Ì¿ø ( Kim Mi-Won ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ Àå±Ý¼º ( Jang Keum-Seong ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ ÃÖÀÚÀ± ( Choi Ja-Yun ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Purpose: The aim of this study was to testify whether clinical performance examination (CPX) was useful to evaluate comprehensive performance for nursing students just prior to graduation.
Method: A cross-sectional descriptive study was designed to examine the usefulness. A total of 61 nursing students whose requirement credits were completed for graduation from a C University in G-city, at December, 5, 2007. Data were analyzed by Pearson¡¯s Correlation Coefficient and Spearman¡¯s rank Correlation Coefficient.
Results: This study showed that both of the finals scores with paper and pens and the clinical practicum scores were not correlated with the CPX scores (r=-.031, p=.811; r=.028, p=.831). Consistency of scores between faculties and standardized patients was moderate (r=.752, p=.000).
Conclusion: CPX was considered as a different and innovative evaluation from previous testing systems to test the various aspects of performance including knowledge, skill and attitude. Therefore, CPX under high raters¡¯ consistency was useful to test nursing students¡¯s final performance. Further study would be needed to develop the standard of CPX system.
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
¼öÇàÆò°¡, Ÿ´çµµ, °£È£Çлý, ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼Ç
Simulation, Evaluation, Validation, Nursing, Student
|
|
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
|
|